How many ever heard of this term? If you hear remarks like, "They don't make things like they used to." and "Things don't last as long as they did in the past."—then you'll know what I mean.
Planned obsolescence is a profitable but short-sighted strategy: it drives repeat sales by intentionally limiting a product's lifespan, yet it shifts hidden costs onto consumers and the environment. While it can sustain business cycles, it often undermines trust, encourages waste, and runs counter to more sustainable, circular approaches to design and manufacturing.
The term gained currency in the 1950s, but the concept is older. Manufacturers discovered that durable products—products that lasted decades—limited repeat sales. The solution was to design products with intentionally limited lifespans. This is accomplished through one or more of the mechanisms listed in the above table.
Refurbishing directly counters systemic and functional obsolescence by keeping products in service. It does little against psychological obsolescence—you cannot refurbish a status symbol back into fashion.
What is your take on this manufacturer-related issue?









No comments:
Post a Comment